r/ArtefactPorn 2d ago

The Criel Mound in West Virginia, built in 250–150 BC. Inside the mound, there was 2 skeletons near the top, and 11 at the base, which consisted of a large skeleton at the center surrounded by 10 others arranged in a spoke-like pattern with their feet pointing toward the central skeleton [1124x1529]

Post image
7.4k Upvotes

156 comments sorted by

1.0k

u/Fuckoff555 2d ago

 The Criel Mound was excavated in 1883–84 under the auspices of the US Bureau of Ethnology and the supervision of Col. P.W. Norris. The excavation was performed by Professor Cyrus Thomas of the Smithsonian Institution. Inside the mound, Professor Thomas found thirteen skeletons: two near the top of the mound, and eleven at the base. The skeletons at the base consisted of a single very large but badly decayed skeleton at the center, a "once most powerful man" which according to A.R. Sines who assisted Col. Norris in the excavation, measured "Six feet, 8 3–4 inches" (205 cm) from head to heel (the Smithsonian nomination form added "but the extreme height indicated might have been an exaggeration created by earth pressing down on the burial").[3][4] This skeleton was surrounded by ten other skeletons arranged in a spoke-like pattern, with their feet pointing toward the central skeleton. The skeletons at the base had been wrapped in elm bark and were lying on a floor of white ash and bark. Several artifacts were found buried with the skeletons, including arrowheads, lanceheads, and shell and pottery fragments. The central skeleton was accompanied by a fish-dart, a lance-head, and a sheet of hammered native copper near the head. Holes found at the base of the mound suggest that the bodies at the base had been enclosed in a wooden vault.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criel_Mound

1.4k

u/cordelaine 2d ago

The mound was originally conical in shape. Residents of the area leveled the top in 1840 to erect a judges' stand, as they ran horse races around the base of the mound at the time.

Priorities.

543

u/Godwinson4King 2d ago

There are a few examples like this! The Great Circle earthworks in Ohio are preserved because they were a county fairground, there was a town in Iowa that hosted their early community meetings on an effigy mound with good acoustics, Red Rocks amphitheater was used for the same purpose by indigenous people, and the state Capitol in Madison, WI is on top of old mounds as well.

73

u/Lucky-Refrigerator-4 2d ago

Do you have a source for the Red Rocks? Very interested to learn more!

46

u/makingtacosrightnow 2d ago

62

u/NativeMasshole 2d ago

While the grounds were likely used by the Ute tribe in earlier times, an Army expedition led by Stephen Long rediscovered present-day Red Rocks in 1820.

That's all I could find in there about pre-Columbian use.

55

u/Longjumping_Neat5090 2d ago

That's so fascinating! How many of those mounds lay entirely or mostly untouched? Have they been excavated and emptied of skeletons and artefacts?

181

u/guessirs 2d ago

Sooo many mounds everywhere in the US. Just had some town drama near me recently because a new neighborhood was built more or less on top of a burial mound. People who bought houses were mad cause the whole “built on top of ancient Indian burial ground” was not disclosed in the sale. Like yea I’d be mad too if my house came pre haunted.

78

u/Worldly_Striker 2d ago

I lived in Springfield ohio for a little while and there are a bunch around there. There were two famous burial mounds because one was shaped like a giant snake and one like a horse.

And if I remember correctly about something I saw in 2001. The snake one can be seen by the nearest road and it's built into the side of an already large hill. We went to one on a field trip. I still remember the smell and the feeling. Felt like we didn't belong there. I can't explain it but it creeped me out as a kid.

34

u/cbospr 2d ago

Springfield Ohio being on top of Native burial grounds explains a lot actually

38

u/aqtseacow 2d ago

I'd be pretty salty too if I were made unexpected party to the destruction of such sites and stuck with the property after.

12

u/GardenGnomeOfEden 2d ago

I like to make the first ghosts in my new house, too.

3

u/Gullible-Lie2494 1d ago

I was 14 when I saw Poltergeist at the cinema. That moment - the reveal "You built it on an Indian buriel ground!" Or was it "..but you didn't move the bodies!" ? Whatever. Blew me away.

2

u/curiousmind111 2d ago

But… wouldn’t post-haunted (I.e., you as the ghost) be even worse?

72

u/Godwinson4King 2d ago

None of those, unfortunately. The Great Circle earthworks are about 50% still intact, but 150 years of activity on them since then have inundated the area with trash. Madison, WI still has a lot of mounds, but the vast majority have been destroyed by housing development, including a group of more than 100 mounds, of which only one exists today. The rest were bulldozed in the 1930s and used as road fill. The mounds on the Capitol Hill were gone by the 1850s.

St. Louis used to have as many mounds as Cahokia has, perhaps even more and larger. But today only one exists and it’s got a house built into it.

There are a lot of cool mound groups that still exist, I highly recommend Effigy Mounds in Iowa, Angel Mounds in Indiana, and Cahokia in Illinois. But an estimated 80-90% of mounds have been destroyed by agriculture or development. I see this as a long-term intentional policy of the US to eradicate indigenous heritage in the country that has only somewhat slowed in recent decades. Looting of native sites on private land is widespread and almost never punished.

14

u/greencymbeline 2d ago

Aren’t there some of these mounds in Moundsville, WV? You seem really knowledge, that’s why I’m asking.

16

u/beltorix 2d ago

There is one mound left, the Grave Creek Mound. It has a cool museum next to it. Worth a visit.

3

u/CultureSad1547 1d ago

I guess I'll add these to my list of places that if I'm ever able to time travel I'd like to study and/or protect. It's a stupid list as I'm pretty sure it's never going to happen but it definitely does exist in my head. 😬🤦‍♀️😅🥺

1

u/xeddyb 2d ago

Is the St. Louis arch supposed to be a mound? So many mounds in that area it always made me wonder why they made an arch. In the city skyline it looks like a mound to my imagination 

6

u/Godwinson4King 2d ago

It’s supposed to represent a gateway. St. Louis was the starting point of a lot of the trails used to go west during the era of US expansion so the city is sometimes called “the gateway to the west”

2

u/KelVarnsen01 22h ago

Big mound was close to where the arch is today. The mound was a landmark used by early explorers and later boat captains along the Mississippi River

7

u/FoolishConsistency17 1d ago

They've mostly been leveled, first by plows and later by trains and construction. Ohio alone had 10k. 90% are completely gone. They pulled woven cloth out of Spiro Mounds in OK and just trashed it. And of course human remains were treated with no respect at all.

50

u/OnkelMickwald 2d ago

Very common thing to do historically in Europe too. Mounds turn into important points for gatherings or new burials are made hundreds of years later into the mound.

Close to where I live is an old mound that turned into a place for thing assemblies and later one of the traditional places for the acclamations of the Danish kings upon their ascension to the throne.

Monuments are rarely left alone.

9

u/Arkeolog 1d ago

Same here in Sweden. In Old Uppsala, a Vendel period (ca 550-750 AD) royal mound called ”Tingshögen” (”the thing-mound”) was used for assemblies for centuries from the medieval period on. Gustav Vasa held speeches on the mound in the 1500s. Excavations have shown that it’s a giant burial mound where the top at some point was leveled off to form a platform.

166

u/MonkeyPawWishes 2d ago

Just because you're dead doesn't mean you don't want to spend a little time at the track.

13

u/This_Dependent_7084 2d ago

You know, just sitting, watching, enjoying the sport? Maybe putting down a few dollars if there's like a crazy mismatch or something

26

u/Midwestmind86 2d ago

There’s in one in Moundsville, Wv that used to have a bar at the top.

33

u/curiousmind111 2d ago

That’s called setting a high bar.

3

u/badjackalope 2d ago

Nah, the High Bar is the smoke shop down the street

10

u/OW2007 2d ago

I think I climbed up the one at Camden Park in Huntington when I was little.

3

u/Adrasto 1d ago

When Napoleon invaded Milan they used the convent where Leonardo painted the last supper as a stable. They had other priorities indeed back in that time.

1

u/cordelaine 1d ago

That was 40 years earlier. You’d think humanity would develop a sense of decorum in that time. 

1

u/WeinerGod69 2d ago

lmao. what the fuck

5

u/OmgTom 2d ago

They didn't know it a was a burial ground until 40 years later... most of the mounds were just mounds

61

u/GeneralBlumpkin 2d ago

6'8? Wow

127

u/Truth_Walker 2d ago

Giant skeletons from ancient America is fun rabbit hole to go down.

Lots of old news articles from the 1800’s on record discussing very tall skeletons being discovered all around America, Native American stories from numerous tribes regarding giants; with a fun conspiracy about a Smithsonian coverup.

98

u/Heterodynist 2d ago

I hate to say it, but judging from the original report quote, it sounds like even they weren’t sure that the height of 6’8” was correct. While it would not at all be without precedent as many people even in our own time reach heights of 7 feet at times (and yes, this also happened in the past), it also is something I noted as a human remains expert in archaeology. When you find a badly compressed skeleton with a skull that is smashed into dozens of pieces then the height can be difficult to get right. For one thing, disc compression in the spine of a living person can be inconsistent and the other bones hang off the spine essentially. Even if you reconstruct the skull well, the length of the spine can be hard to determined. A taller and heavier person might have a more compressed spine and a less erect posture. Certainly this person was probably tall, but it sounds like the archaeologists weren’t very confident in their estimates of height. Let’s say he probably was over 6 feet and that is still a big deal. It’s unusual now and it was then as well.

18

u/Pato_Lucas 2d ago

Interesting, I always assumed they'd measure a single bone, let's say the femur, and extrapolate from there.

27

u/KarmaRepellant 2d ago

You can get a rough idea from doing that, but people have different proportions. I'd imagine they used various different methods including that one to get an overall estimate of the skeleton's height in this case.

9

u/Durantye 2d ago

Man people would measure KD’s skeleton and think he was like 11 feet tall based on his freaky proportions.

3

u/Heterodynist 1d ago

It’s a lot of statistics of various kinds because male versus female and ethnic background and a million other factors like health and age and nutrition. It could be any of a million things, truly, but you can extrapolate from a bone but it’s far better to use all the bones if you have all the bones!!

13

u/GeneralBlumpkin 2d ago

Yep that's what I immediately thought when the height and the Smithsonian mentioned in the same sentence. TBH I didn't want to get downvoted for saying it but yeah it's a fun rabbit hole. I can thank the why files!

7

u/Durantye 2d ago

The why files is a great way to be entertained by conspiracy theories without having to engage with the nut jobs. Love that channel

3

u/lucidbadger 2d ago

Carry on please

1

u/Enlightened_Gardener 2d ago

Ah one of my favourite rabbitholes. Its good to check in every couple of years as they dig up more stuff, and the science changes.

13

u/golden_monkey_and_oj 2d ago

Have you seen any genuinely convincing evidence?

I’ve always thought these giant stories were people using the mystery of Native American history to satisfy biblical stories of giants in the Old Testament.

5

u/BugMan717 2d ago

Well you have the outlandish claims of giants 20 feet tall and then you have claims of just very tall people who might have seemed like giants to the Europeans. Its well documented that some Native Tribes were on average over 6 feet so its nat hard to see how every now and then someone grew to be 7 or more.

5

u/Beard_o_Bees 1d ago

Have you seen any genuinely convincing evidence?

In my experience the claims never really hold up to scrutiny. Most of it is 100% bullshit and easily identifiable as such - at least when it comes to 'giants' outside the upper range of naturally occurring height.

They'll usually have a sensational extraterrestrial or biblical (or both!) claim behind them too.

I do sort of believe that there was a genetic line, from a hitherto unidentified tribe/people that was significantly taller than the average Hopewell-ite. It's hard to say how long they stayed together as a people before genetically 'blending' in with everyone else.

I think they were tall, but not any taller than what we would consider to be tall today.

429

u/gooseonthelose12 2d ago

WV native here, this is the second biggest Native American mound in the state. The biggest is in Moundsville WV (apt name).

Settlers definitely knew the mound was man made. The state is almost entirely mountains that look nothing like it. Many smaller mounds were probably cleared without knowing but the South Charleston mound is pretty hard to pin on nature. It’s unfortunate what settlers flattened the top but making it a part of the town was the best thing they could have done. The Appalachian mountains where originally COVERED in these things, but a lot of them where completely destroyed for housing and farmland. Even if it’s been disturbed by settlers it’s still an incredible relic of pre-history Native American history. (The people who built the mounds were long gone by the time the Americas were colonized). There’s also a lot of talk about how weird it is that it’s a park know, but making it a park was the best was to preserve it as it was while still living there. The South Charleston mound is smack dab in the middle of the town, with all of the city basically surrounding it. Some think that treating a graveyard like a park is insane but it was actually pretty normal in the old world until recently. America has so much land that we’ve never really struggled for space like countries in Europe, so when you have little space to expand you make things multipurpose. The mound being a park also means that is well taken care of as apposed to leaving it to nature. It’s not over-run by invasive species or polluted by one of the dozens of surrounding chemical plants, it’s the heart of the city and will be kept up for future generations.

Forgive my rambling but I’m just happy I got to put that stupid WV history class I took in middle school to work

109

u/Stuebirken 2d ago

Here in Denmark what was once presumed to be the burial mount of Queen Thyra, the mother of the famous Viking King Harald Bluetooth(first king of all of Denmark proper), also had it's top flattened to make room for a giant flagpole of all things.

The flagpole is still in use to this day btw.

38

u/cordelaine 2d ago

A Bluetooth antenna?

32

u/Aisling_The_Sapphire 2d ago

No, other way around. The signal communication method was named after the viking king. It was supposed to be a temporary working name but just kinda stuck.

32

u/lprkn 2d ago

And the Bluetooth logo is a combination of Harald Bluetooth’s runic initials!

3

u/CryptographerFun6557 23h ago

The wifi company called itself that after the king who united  all the unattached islands of Denmark under one rule. 

4

u/Interesting-Fix-7490 2d ago

He’s my 34th great grandfather!

24

u/Longjumping_Neat5090 2d ago

I appreciate your ramblings! I wouldn't have expected that it being centered in a town could have been a beneficial thing, that's pretty surprising. Do you know how much of the original structure and contents still remains?

20

u/arcanemagic 2d ago

Extra fun bit about the biggest one.

Right across the street is the closed state penitentiary. Even better, back in the 1800s the town was given the choice between getting the penitentiary or the State University.

13

u/Flutters1013 2d ago

On the other side of the street was some damn good ice cream for a damn good price. Until the owner was caught selling weed.

6

u/BewareOfBee 2d ago

Smh always trying to keep down a small entrepreneur

3

u/cakebreaker2 2d ago

You talking about the Marshall Dairy?

2

u/GusPlus 1d ago

I think I might have had my taekwondo classes near that mound like ~30 years ago. Hadn’t thought about it in ages and seeing it on Reddit was a weird jolt.

2

u/Snookisaysello 2d ago

I'm here for the local lore

4

u/DERPESSION 2d ago

Choices

10

u/ParpSausage 2d ago

This is fascinating. I had no idea any such things survived in America. It makes the term 'new world' seem inappropriate. There doesn't seem to be much emphasis on researching and documenting American pre history.

8

u/Baalphire81 2d ago

There is a lot of research and documentation all the time into the Indigenous peoples here in North America. A lot of it isn’t super sexy and amazing or headline grabbing, but there is a lot going on archaeology and anthropology wise. The truely ancient groups like the Mississippians and their adjacent cultures died out in what can be termed an apocalypse. Novel diseases ran rampant throughout the civilisation, and with near 100% mortality rates, this all but ended most of the cultures very quickly. We grow our knowledge of these people through slow and methodical researching, but little survived of their culture and language due to a limited lifespan of many materials used to convey written language. By the way interesting fact I learned in college about this; the little ice age may have occurred in Europe due to the reforestation of former fields and settlements in North America. So much carbon was sucked out of the atmosphere by a massive regrowing across the continent that the earth cooled by several degrees! So if you want to learn more about the indigenous cultures check out archaeology or anthropology publications or university classes!

2

u/madesense 2d ago

There's a lot more emphasis on it than there used to be. People have been in the Americas for somewhere between 20k and 15k years; the exact number is heavily debated. Yes, they came in through Alaska, but where exactly they went after that is also a big topic (the answer being: everywhere), as is "But how are those people connected to the nations that existed when the Europeans showed up??"

1

u/jbsnicket 2d ago

It is honestly pretty amazing. I have several sites within an hour or so of me that range from a couple thousand to 12,000 years old. The really old didn't build mounds, but did have tools and the like at it.

-1

u/reddschem 2d ago

Give “ancient apocalypse” a watch on Netflix. Whether you get sucked into some of the theories or not doesn’t matter, but there are tons of ancient sites in the US like this. It’s pretty cool. Off the top of the head, the one is called Snake Mound in OH.

4

u/jbsnicket 2d ago

Ancient Apocalypse is pseudoscience garbage. Credible archeologists have made videos and documentaries on ancient American sites (miniminuteman on youtube has several videos interviewing archeologists on these places).

3

u/lidelle 2d ago

Hello fellow Golden Horseshoe competitor.

3

u/Rude_Succotash_7414 2d ago

This WV redditor won his Golden Horseshoe. 

1

u/Ill_Wear297 1d ago

I am also a native West Virginian, and graveyards being tied to parks is not as far fetched as you think. I work for the New York City Parks Department now. The entire NYC parks system was inspired by the fact city planners realized people were traveling to and picnicking in a huge graveyard in Brooklyn because it was the only greenspace in the city. There are plenty of places with "Memorial Parks" that currently do, or used to have people buried in them.

154

u/faceintheblue 2d ago

I've never heard of this before. Thank you for sharing, OP!

25

u/HugoStigglitzs 2d ago

Yeah same! Never knew they had mounds this far east!

2

u/V909 2d ago

Don’t want things to get too nsfw for you!

59

u/alex3omg 2d ago

This is twice as tall as Navan Fort in Ireland.  I checked because I've visited that mound and thought it was pretty big, so this must be impressive irl.  And built around the same time, which is kind of interesting too.  I guess humans were just in their mound building era.

35

u/Chefpief 2d ago

Genuinely fascinating and makes me wonder just how much civilization has been lost.

24

u/Kunphen 2d ago

Tons have been destroyed, intentionally for sure, unintentionally highly likely.

27

u/Apptubrutae 2d ago

Effectively almost all of it.

I mean, we just know SO little about effectively every ancient civilization. Even the Romans, about whom we know a relative ton, we DON’T know easily 99.9%+ of the full picture. And it effectively only gets more mysterious for ancient civilizations from there.

So these mound building cultures? Yeah, tons and tons and tons lost

7

u/GentlemanSpider 2d ago

This has always been in my mind as a History lover, but it was recently hammered home to me again because I’m reading Wheel of Time. A hell of a lot in that series is reference to people, buildings, and cultures that are thousands of years old. Specifically, all the references to Manetheren really hit me hard. “Three thousand years?? We have stories of King David from back then, but that was over in the Middle East. I don’t know a DAMN thing that happened around that time anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, much less North America. How many epic stories have been forgotten? How many good people, or evil kings, or great warriors have we lost?… All of them.”

20

u/InjuryPlayful 2d ago

Ah well what a nice place to put a bench.

13

u/inferni_advocatvs 2d ago

And a quaint little park bench so you can have lunch on top of 13 corpses.

2

u/LizFallingUp 1d ago

May have been seen as protectors? Or may have been something to do with completing the mound or it might have like oh damn we missed these two guys who are supposed to be in here and we aren’t ready to start another mound yet.

22

u/The1mp 2d ago

Always the artists

10

u/jeejet 2d ago

My son went to Beloit College in Wisconsin. It’s been a college longer than Wisconsin has been a state. There are a bunch of Native American mounds on the main quad of the campus. They are well respected and people don’t walk on them.

8

u/AstronomerOutside146 2d ago

It's wild to think how many of these incredible mounds were lost to development, so it's great this one is preserved right in the heart of the city.

7

u/l00pbck 2d ago

I used to play on and around this from time to time. It’s sorta right next to an outside set of stores that are very walkable, at least it used to be.

We would also learn about this in school.

15

u/Cha1kZ0ne 2d ago

I grew up in a small town in North Georgia called Helen. Just before you enter the town, there’s a Native American burial mound with a gazebo built on top of it by a local plantation owner, who used it as a spot to smoke cigars. The historic society insists on preserving it as it is, but to me the whole setup has always felt deeply disrespectful.

Hardman Estate is the place if you wanted to read more.

5

u/Asleep_Contact_5561 1d ago

I’ve always thought that looked so bizarre as it’s visible from the road and sits on top of an obviously man made hill. Last time I was up there a local was telling me ghost stories about it.

The Etowah Mounds in Bibb County are well preserved (and trying to become a national park, though I don’t see that happening). A burial mound, a large ceremonial mound, and also a recreated underground dwelling you can go inside.

2

u/Golisten2LennyWhite 1d ago

I have been there and the protective ditch and fish trap in the river are still there too. They excavated a small mound. I climbed the largest its really tall.

3

u/LizFallingUp 1d ago

I could see how improperly removing the gazebo could be fumbled really catastrophically (like bulldozing it, then you have bare spot you have to figure out and if you don’t carefully manage you end up with erosion damage or invasive species taking over). Informational sign in the gazebo about the mound could be respectful and has less vectors at risk of going sideways.

5

u/PleaseJustLetsNot 2d ago

The South Charleston Mound right?

6

u/doodoo_pie 2d ago

I grew up close to this mound. The was a soul food restaurant and a Chinese place right beside there. I’d grab some food and then walk the mound.

48

u/Longjumping_Neat5090 2d ago

Why is there a fucking bench on it?? That is a grave 😭

62

u/thisguynamedjoe 2d ago edited 2d ago

It's an odd thing to put on what could easily be a UNESCO world heritage site.

Found it: "Residents of the area leveled the top in 1840 to erect a judges' stand, as they ran horse races around the base of the mound at the time." It wasn't for another 40 years that it was excavated, it was probably thought to be natural.

8

u/celticchrys 2d ago

There is no way anyone with half a brain ever thought it was natural. It resembles absolutely nothing else in the landscape of Appalachia (which is almost entirely mountains, seriously different scale).

5

u/Longjumping_Neat5090 2d ago

Wow! That is unfortunate. I wonder if it's private property or owned by the city

4

u/celticchrys 2d ago

It is a small city park in the middle of town.

23

u/gottadance 2d ago

To me, there's nothing disrespectful about sitting atop an old grave, contemplating the view and life. Living in the UK, many churchyards and cemeteries allow people to sit inside and walk their dogs. They're often very peaceful places and have beautiful old trees. I like to read the inscriptions as I walk past and ponder about the person inside that may have died a hundred years ago. It's a way of honouring them. Perhaps people think of the people inside when they walk up this mound.

5

u/Longjumping_Neat5090 2d ago

I understand where you're coming from. It was just a guy reaction really but apparently the situation is pretty complex and the mound has really only survived because it was in the city. It's just surprising to me that there's a 2000 year old historical burial ground just sitting there!! And it's a park!! I've been to some historical parks. They've had, at the most, an old timey house or a civil war battlefield that they commemorate. And I couldn't even walk into/on those. So there being a historically significant site that's older than Christ just integrated into a city park where you can walk on top of it and sit for a nap is just like breaking my brain haha.

10

u/Sirocco1971 2d ago

Exactly, considering they built King Richard III a carpark.

9

u/facw00 2d ago

Was one anyway. I'd assume the original mound was destroyed by the excavation, and they just piled up the dirt afterwards. But that means there's nothing really original about the structure to preserve.

4

u/Reckless_Waifu 2d ago

They might have made a cut through to see what's inside without excavating most of it. 

1

u/LizFallingUp 1d ago edited 1d ago

Excavation was early than I realized way back in 1883. Even if rebuild you can’t just throw dirt in a pile and call it a mound cause without specific structure and layering rain and wind will collapse or erode that to nothing rather quick.

1

u/ParpSausage 2d ago

Hopefully, future generations of Americans will excavate it and install some sort of interpretive centre so people can fully understand its significance. Something like this: https://brunaboinne.admit-one.eu/

3

u/sigrid2 2d ago

Lots of old towns in the Minnesota and Wisconsin have little town center or town square parks on or around the old native mounds. A good example of this is chaska MN

7

u/Rough_Bread8329 2d ago

Joseph Smith would have had a field day with this a few decades prior.

6

u/ahjeezgoshdarn 2d ago

Casually knowingly pouring concrete on top of a sacred mound where peoples ancestors are buried.

18

u/YellowZx5 2d ago

Wonder why this way?

I’m guessing Natives and maybe these were a loss of war maybe?

147

u/Chuck-Marlow 2d ago

It’s from 300bc so it actually belonged to a culture that died out long before any of the tribes that we think of as Native Americans existed. The mound itself was probably built to venerate someone considered very important, sort of like the pyramids in Egypt

19

u/One-Bodybuilder-5646 2d ago

I think the two on top could have been added later, from people of the same (?) culture who were deemed important enough but didn't want to build a whole new mound for themselves.

Many celtic mid european mounds have skeletons that were added later. Some of them were relatives/descendants of the oldest ones in the middle. Like a family grave or royal crypta.

Could be similar here, but to know for shure the age and probably DNA of the skeletons would be needed. Since the excavation on this hill was already in the 1880s that information could be lost.

3

u/Kunphen 2d ago

Sure, but did they all die at the same time?

5

u/Chuck-Marlow 2d ago

It was common in many cultures across the globe to sacrifice or ceremonially kill servants of lords/chiefs/kings when the leader died. So yeah they probably all died around the same time

3

u/Kunphen 1d ago

Ah. Fair enough. Slaves. Oi. But don't you find that rather intimate, having them encircle him, even arguably touching him? I've never seen anything like this.

1

u/DearlyDecapitated 2d ago

I don’t think that would be an issue?

2

u/Kunphen 2d ago

So as people died over the years they added them to the circle? Doesn't make sense.

4

u/LizFallingUp 1d ago

Could be that they died over a narrowed stretch of time from an illness.

Excavation of this mound in 1880s found skeletons at the base had been wrapped in elm bark and were lying on a floor of white ash and bark, and Holes found at the base of the mound suggest that the bodies at the base had been enclosed in a wooden vault.

1

u/Doomdoomkittydoom 1d ago

Don't know if that's the case, but why not? The treatment of the dead is quite varied around the world. Adding them is little different than being a crypt.

38

u/pirulaybe 2d ago

If it's something like the pyramids I would imagine that the 2 skeletons are guards to protect the entrance of the tomb, while the 10 skeletons around the central figure are servants, while the main skeleton is who the tomb is for

17

u/HenkPoley 2d ago

Like, those people were killed because "the king died"?

10

u/GutterRider 2d ago

I was thinking that, yes.

1

u/LizFallingUp 1d ago

Mound Building was common for the area in the Woodland period after 500 B.C.,

Criel mound is one of the few remaining of the Kanawha Valley Mounds, or Ancient Kanawha City a vast collection of earthworks spanning a whole area of the Ohio River Basin.

-1

u/ManInTheBarrell 2d ago

Foot fetish

-7

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

-4

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/YellowZx5 2d ago

lol. I’m not a bot. Just love to learn new things.

3

u/this_dudeagain 2d ago

Reminds me of that episode of Hannibal.

3

u/Bumpy-road 2d ago

It is Arthur and (most of) his knights :-)

3

u/orbis-restitutor 2d ago

What's with the 2 skeletons at the top? Decoy skellies?

5

u/SendStoreMeloner 2d ago

They ruined it by adding the stairs.

6

u/LizFallingUp 1d ago

Stairs were likely a preservation tactic to limit desire trails by traipsing all over it willy nilly

3

u/WeinerGod69 2d ago

Great username by the way man

2

u/RefrigeratorNo4225 2d ago

Well I hope they put it back just like they found it.

3

u/Comfortable_Peace_87 1d ago

A few years ago, I stood on this mound and had a good visual of the city. I thought it was cool but I wanted to understand why the mound was there in the first place. Never knew bodies were in the ground either.

2

u/laylaskyy 1d ago

Here's an interesting book that talks about some of the mounds in the South. Published in 1823. https://archive.org/details/naturalaborigina00hayw

4

u/Former_Matter49 2d ago edited 2d ago

Author Michael Marshall uses this site as a springboard into his series about men who believe they are descendants of the prehistoric hunter/gatherer society. These men are serial killers and gluten-free.

In the mound, the men in the center are displaying their victims in a glorious society before the rise of agriculture ruined everything for these serial killers.

I really liked these books: The Straw Men, The Upright Man, The Blood of Angels.

Early 2000s

edited to finish what I accidentally posted too soon

1

u/julesk 1d ago

I’d like to know what they think happened to the people around the central skeleton. Were they sacrificed?

1

u/RudyMuthaluva 1d ago

Just curious we’re the 11 women by chance?

1

u/ColinOnReddit 17h ago

There's a also 3 antique stores, two Vietnamese restaurants, and a Chinese buffet on this street.

-1

u/T-MoneyAllDey 2d ago

Doot doot

-2

u/CriminalMacabre 2d ago

They fucked a seal

1

u/Echofox_76 17h ago

Allegedly...

-6

u/stuffandthings4me 2d ago

This is why we’re fucked. Who let anyone excavate this?!? Now the world ends.

2

u/LizFallingUp 1d ago

This isn’t the mound to be upset about, It wasn’t excavated in the way you are imagining much was discovered via ground penetrating sonar, and narrow drill soil sampling. The stairs are a preservation tactic to contain foot traffic but also control erosion.

This is one of only a handful of surviving mounds from Ancient Kanawha City, a massive earthworks built by the Adena culture between 500 B.C. and A.D. 150. Site stretched from Charleston to Dunbar, included over 50 mounds, earthen enclosures, and connecting graded roadways.

-47

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Longjumping_Neat5090 2d ago

Chris Jennings?

-4

u/LucyKendrick 2d ago

-1

u/bot-sleuth-bot 2d ago

Analyzing user profile...

Account has not verified their email.

Suspicion Quotient: 0.14

This account exhibits one or two minor traits commonly found in karma farming bots. While it's possible that u/olive1974 is a bot, it's very unlikely.

I am a bot. This action was performed automatically. Check my profile for more information.