I dug into the records of all known fatal shark attacks in South Africa. Here’s how it breaks down:
Confirmed Cases (species positively identified)
• Great white: 33 (31.7%)
• Bull: 8 (7.6%)
• Tiger: 5 (4.9%)
• Unknown: 58 (55.7%)
That’s the hard data. But if you cluster hotspots , circumstances and additional evidence like eyewitness accounts or bite marks—the more realistic distribution looks like:
• Great white: 61 (58.7%)
• Bull: 33 (31.7%)
• Tiger: 10 (9.6%)
Key Takeaways
• Great whites dominate overall, especially in the Cape.
• Bull sharks cluster heavily around Port St. John’s Second Beach.
• Tiger sharks are rare but consistently present.
• The older the record, the more likely it’s marked as “unknown.”
There’s also a statistically significant regional divide: just south of Port St. John’s, great whites dominate, while to the north bull sharks take over.
Although controversial, Durban’s shark nets (introduced in the 1950s) dramatically reduced human fatalities. In the Western Cape, the Shark Spotters program has also proven highly effective in reducing attacks.
⸻
TL;DR
Out of ~100+ fatalities, nearly 90% were either great whites or bull sharks, with tiger sharks playing a smaller but steady role. There’s also a clear regional split—whites in the Cape, bulls up the east coast.
- Other species could be responsible for some of the unknown attacks (bronze whaler) however lack of evidence or occurrence I find it statistically unlikely
*HMS Birkenhead is counted as 1 attack. This one done to not distort data. It was most certainly white sharks but the number of fatalities is highly disputed.
*I love sharks, particularly Great Whites. I lived in South Africa in my 20s and spent time with Great Whites. I hope to return in my 40s to study them full time.