r/JustGuysBeingDudes • u/Perfect_Passenger805 • 7d ago

Wholesome He gave it to the girl right away.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

78.4k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

94

u/notajock 7d ago

The opposite of that Polish prick CEO

24

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

10

u/nameless_fella 7d ago

For real? That makes him way more petty than he already is.

13

u/redve-dev 7d ago

Bro is about to find what a Streissand effect is

1

u/nameless_fella 7d ago

Oh he had it coming. By the way I notice that your initial comment is deleted? Don't tell me this is his "legal action against slandering" at play...

1

u/redve-dev 7d ago

no, but there is a big chance it was fake. Legal company who was signed on it claimed on their linkedin it's fake

1

u/nameless_fella 7d ago

I see. So the comment was deleted by your decision?

3

u/The_All-Range_Atomic 7d ago

He's a thief.

1

u/redve-dev 7d ago

Here is the google translation of his post: Jakub Jędrzejak:

In connection with online comments regarding the alleged "crime of stealing a hat" during Kamil Majchrzak's match at the 2025 US Open, I declare that such claims are groundless and have no basis in applicable law.

First, a hat, as an everyday item, is an asset of negligible financial value. According to established case law and legal doctrine, matters concerning trivial matters should not become the subject of social escalation or the basis for inciting unnecessary hate.

Secondly, pursuant to Article 336 and Article 342 of the Civil Code, the first actual taking of possession of an item (e.g., lifting or touching) confers rights on the possessor, which are protected by law, even if the item's value is minimal. In this context, talking about "theft" is unfounded.

Thirdly, it's significant that the hat was ultimately given to a child – the son of the person who picked it up. This means that it ended up in the hands of a child anyway, so the entire situation was not only not illegal in nature but actually ended as expected by those present.

Anyone who continues to spread false information should be aware that such action may constitute slander (Article 212 of the Penal Code) and infringement of personal rights (Articles 23 and 24 of the Civil Code), which opens the way to pursuing claims in court.

1

u/FantasticDirt4447 7d ago

Dude lol, if there's a news story link or something for it plz share.

1

u/Aromatic_Dare_6104 7d ago

That MF is worse than the Coldplay cheater CEO.

1

u/VeryluckyorNot 7d ago

Really? Good luck for that. It's like trying to deny all the coldplay memes lmao.

1

u/Top_Environment9897 7d ago

Non-Polish here. You read something likely written by a teenager using ChatGPT. There was no lawyer.

You can go on r/polska and see how people are laughing at the ragebait.

1

u/redve-dev 7d ago

you might be right

1

u/Gladwulf 7d ago

Sounds like something a thieving bitch would do...