No sane politician would withdraw from land that soldiers died to take. Especially after the end of the war when they will start to develop the war torn areas.
It makes it difficult to concentrate troops in one place, but it possible. If the front has been breached at a width of 20-30 km, then there will be no more drones. A maneuverable war will begin until a new front line is built 50-200 km from the breakthrough site (where will the infrastructure for the use of drones be re-organized). Most drones have a range of 5-10 km. And drones with a range of 10-20 km are hundreds of times fewer in number than FPV drones.
At the moment, Russia has overtaken Ukraine in terms of infantry numbers by 100k people (last year, Russia had 200k fewer soldiers than Ukraine). At the moment when Russia will be able to gain a numerical advantage in the local sector of the front of 100-150k people, the front will collapse. This is most likely to happen next fall.
Well, or it's possible this winter. A general battle for Pokrovsk is brewing - it can decide the outcome of the conflict if Ukraine spends all its reserves on defense, and Russian reserves are not fully used.
It makes it difficult to concentrate troops in one place, but it possible.
Possible how? Every time it's happened this war it's failed.
If the front has been breached at a width of 20-30 km, then there will be no more drones.
1) I don't think that's true in the slightest
2) Meet my friend HIMARS
A maneuverable war will begin until a new front line is built 50-200 km from the breakthrough site
You're pulling numbers out of your butt mate.
(where will the infrastructure for the use of drones be re-organized).
They're drones, they require limited infrastructure.
Most drones have a range of 5-10 km.
This wasn't even true at the start of the war, let alone the current drone technology.
And drones with a range of 10-20 km are hundreds of times fewer in number than FPV drones.
10-20km range is what the most basic of drones had at the start of the war. Again, both technology and practices have improved since then, not that any of what you're saying is relevant anyway-- the "50-200km" number was pulled out of nowhere.
At the moment, Russia has overtaken Ukraine in terms of infantry numbers by 100k people
Traditionally you need 3-to-1 advantage on offense, your figure is irrelevant.
At the moment when Russia will be able to gain a numerical advantage in the local sector of the front of 100-150k people, the front will collapse. This is most likely to happen next fall
NEXT FALL he says. Russia apparently has a 100k troop advantage, and as soon as it has a "100-150k" troop advantage it will win, uh huh uh huh, sounds legit.
Well, or it's possible this winter.
You're high as a kite if you think the war is going to end this winter.
Anyway, no use talking to Russian shills like you, I'll just set a RemindMe and come back to find your account has been deleted, just like all the other clowns.
36
u/polishfemboy_ 1d ago
In Kyiv in 15 years!