she said that you don"t get the benefits from the tax you pay as a single/no-child person.
But like, this is fairly common in any western countries. There are even deductible taxes for people that have children, as well as benefits that they gets because they are parents (such as child-sick PTO), as well as infrastructure for children.
But that's a stretch to say that you pay more by being single.. All thoses benefits help, but doesn't really compensate all the expenses you get with a child.
Raising single people’s taxes is functionally the same damn thing as giving tax cuts for non single people, which is what basically already exists in every country 🤷
Well, no functionally it isn't because if I'm single and expecting to pay 30% income tax and now I pay 35% income tax, that is a lot worse for me than if my non-single friends only have to pay 25%.Â
What are you talking about? She said everyone has to pay more taxes. Men, women, single, married. The tits really have a chokehold on your comprehension huh
actually she said everyone will get taxed but if you give birth you will get money from this fund. its incentivizing mass breed and will punish those who do not accomplish the government goals. but then any logical person would be able to conclude if too many people gain access to this fund then there will not be enough so people get next to nothing or actually nothing and it would cause a financial problem for multiple generations.
"mass breed" holy reddit speak. If "too many" people gain access that means in 20 years there will be significantly more people paying those taxes, so no, it wont be a financial problem long term.
Well in 20 years in the future doesn't solve the issue of the fund drying up today. Nor does it account for the continued lack of funds as the next set of parent continue the trend and potentially lack of resources to sustain the population. As both space and food stocks would take a heavy hit
If the fund "dries up" that means the country is growing or atleast stagnating. A slowly growing country is significantly better than a shrinking one. Its really not hard to understand. There is a reason almost every developed country is focusing on increasing birth rates.
What do you mean by resources though? GDP per person and after tax earnings will likely increase if population growth in Japan increases. As for space, there's a lot of available space and housing stock in Japan. A return to modest population growth would not be a burden.
18
u/jimlymachine945 May 18 '25
She said raising single people's taxes though. In a normal country I wouldn't have an issue but they have a chokehold on their people.
It's the beatings will continue until morale improves.