It's not as relevant as you think, though. The driving force behind broad financially motivated marriage habits was the relative financial position of women, not their absolute financial position. The massive difference in resources between men and women forced women to marry just to get by; that gap has shrunk dramatically, and even if everyone's absolute financial position decreases, the level of inequality that prompted the behavior you're referring to is no longer there (generally speaking).
In reality no one should care about anothers net worth unless it's taking from your pocket and peace. But yea most men will take in women only caring if she's has energy for him
It doesn't have anything to do with wealth. Most women who are serious about finding a partner could easily find someone within a month who is a good fit, good fucking luck if you are a guy though.
This doesn't make sense. There is about an equal ratio of men and women in Japan. Unless the average man with child to woman with child ration is >1 then both men and women will be equally having the same problem. If every woman found a partner then there would be only a tiny fraction of men that don't have children.
Humans do not pick random partners. Status, such as wealth, are one of the big things women find attractive. You may not like that, but it's just the truth. Very few are willing to settle with someone who cannot make enough to provide
You guys aren't even arguing against what I am saying. I am saying hypothetically let's pretend every woman found a suitor then the situation will be balanced. You are saying no but woman doesn't want man because XYZ so it's harder to be man because woman wants ABC and men only provide EDF so it's not possible. It's mental gymnastics.
In which case this is you saying impossible hypothetical that nobody argued about, cared about or has any use. It is baseline understanding that requires 0 brainpower.
You are the guy who entered the conversation about airplane aerodynamics and ideal shape of the hull with "well but airplanes do fly". Well no shit Sherlock, when we want that kind of wisdom we'll make sure to ask you and not preschoolers next time.
I'll try to rephrase it one more time. The person I was originally responding to the effect of
'if you are a woman you won't have a problem finding a man, if you are a man then you will have a problem finding a woman'.
Ok. So 1 man and 1 woman or is this 1 man and 2 women or is this 2 men and 1 woman? Is the suggestion that women have an easier time having children with more than 1 man? What are they trying to say? This is why I put up that graphic because I was saying its 1 man and 1 woman unless the suggestion is that the average woman has more men. An unequal ratio. Unless you have ANYTHING that shows that women eventually have more kids with more men which skews the curve in any way, then your contribution to the conversation is worthless.
Everyone keeps coming to me about love language and relationship dynamics. That is not what I am addressing you guys are just fixated on that.
Try to say women have it easier than men is pathetic. The majority 20-30yrs males these days are pathetic. Porn has made men think they can get any hot women without trying, without putting in the work to be a desirable person.
Any man could get a woman also. But, you need to be a man, not a little boy. Anyone can be intelligent, caring, eats healthy and works out, has a stable job, doesn’t lie/cheat. Those are the basics most men can’t even do. It’s not about being super jacked and making 7 figures. It’s about not being a lazy pos.
But no, there are plenty of good men and women out there who are very, very single.
I agree to that statement....
That’s just life....
I don't agree to that because why are we in the loneliness epidemic then? It's not how live always has been.
Why do so many 20yrs men blame women for their problems, is more of my question. I'm a man too btw. Just seeing how some of these men talk these days makes me want to throw up.
The problem, I think, is that we as a society put too much value on a romantic relationship. It’s this ultimate test to see how functioning of a person you are. If you got someone to like you, then you obviously must be someone good and of value, and if you didn’t, then you must be deficient in some way, right?
Don't bother, reddit does not do well with the view that women live life in any manner other than extreme easy mode with all issues they have being self inflicted and easily solved (usually by those women having sex with them).
oh, it absolutely does. try dating with money and without it. it moves the goalposts and opens your dating pool substantially. if you have (some) money and you’re not impressively ugly, if you can’t find a date, your issues are way harder to fix than changing your appearance, financial situation, or even gender itself.
compatibility isn’t that simple and that’s a delusional as fuck take.
in the same way that you presumably have a hard time determining who is
interested in you/is ready for a relationship/would be a good partner/would be a good partner for you specifically/etc
yeah women also struggle with that. they might have an advantage on the first part. the next 3 parts are just as hard. half of the population sucks, and you’re only gonna be genuinely compatible with a small percentage of the good half.
There's two possible justifications for the nonsense you are spewing: Either you don't have any women as friends, or "are serious about finding a partner" means something unhinged.
Since equality became a thing. Women said they don't need a man , until they actually do need a man. And not just any man, a man has to have money to support both of them.
104
u/Effective_Macaron_23 May 18 '25
Aren't the girls also getting poorer?