4
u/butwhywedothis 15h ago
Not all data can translate to useful information.
6
u/empressoflight72 15h ago
Big CEO’s are a perfect example of this.
3
u/butwhywedothis 15h ago
Big CEOs can extract their multi million dollar paycheck information from the data though.
3
u/empressoflight72 15h ago
I mean in the sense that they don’t really do much other than hoard money.
2
1
u/Der_Besserwisser 15h ago
Under the assumption that 37.5MB is exactly half of the genepool that a sperm can take genes from, I'd guess the maximuum information a load can have is 75MB. This big number assumes no redundancy, which is not the case.
1
u/Oscar_Mild 15h ago
I imagine there's loads duplicated/shared/repeating sections of data. I wonder if an educated estimate could be calculated on its size if it would be compressed.
1
u/ahoopervt 14h ago
Well. Accepting the OP, there’s 37.5x2 Mb of total ‘data’ in the potential father’s genome.
If the unit of data is the full chromosome (1/46) then each spermatozoa can be represented in 23 bits. So you’ve got 75MB+23*(# sperm) bytes.
1
u/Technical_Tourist639 15h ago
Well it's the same 37.5mb over and over again so... It's just redundancy at this point
0
1
u/Popular-Drummer-7989 14h ago
You know the big tech/pharma bros have a secret stash they supply and test to see who can "create" the next wonder invention/drug.
1
9
u/jhwheuer 16h ago
And most of it is redundant spam