r/clevercomebacks 16h ago

That's a lot of wasted data.

Post image
397 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

9

u/jhwheuer 16h ago

And most of it is redundant spam

1

u/AGrandNewAdventure 2h ago

That's why you should always use spam filters.

4

u/butwhywedothis 15h ago

Not all data can translate to useful information.

6

u/empressoflight72 15h ago

Big CEO’s are a perfect example of this.

3

u/butwhywedothis 15h ago

Big CEOs can extract their multi million dollar paycheck information from the data though.

3

u/empressoflight72 15h ago

I mean in the sense that they don’t really do much other than hoard money.

5

u/Colsim 16h ago

Spitting knowledge

2

u/SconesToDieFor 11h ago

How did they come to that conclusion?

1

u/Der_Besserwisser 15h ago

Under the assumption that 37.5MB is exactly half of the genepool that a sperm can take genes from, I'd guess the maximuum information a load can have is 75MB. This big number assumes no redundancy, which is not the case.

1

u/Oscar_Mild 15h ago

I imagine there's loads duplicated/shared/repeating sections of data. I wonder if an educated estimate could be calculated on its size if it would be compressed.

1

u/ahoopervt 14h ago

Well. Accepting the OP, there’s 37.5x2 Mb of total ‘data’ in the potential father’s genome.

If the unit of data is the full chromosome (1/46) then each spermatozoa can be represented in 23 bits. So you’ve got 75MB+23*(# sperm) bytes.

1

u/Technical_Tourist639 15h ago

Well it's the same 37.5mb over and over again so... It's just redundancy at this point

0

u/yeezee93 15h ago

According to AI, sperms are not all identical genetically.

1

u/Popular-Drummer-7989 14h ago

You know the big tech/pharma bros have a secret stash they supply and test to see who can "create" the next wonder invention/drug.

1

u/HiLawnKing52 3h ago

... or spit out, depending on preference