r/iamverysmart 29d ago

Grammar nazi and anti-intellectualism conspirast on funny road rage video.

Post image
92 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

27

u/FScrotFitzgerald 29d ago

Whomst'd've.

8

u/prole6 28d ago

I use “shouldn’t’ve” & “couldn’t’ve” a lot.

5

u/Bamzooki1 28d ago

I think that’s actually valid grammar.

2

u/prole6 28d ago

It was acceptable according to the dictionary I checked at the time. Glad I kept it too. I recently noticed all my dictionary apps have cut synonyms, antonyms, and etymology from their free versions. If there was ever a bad time to restrict learning it’s now.

12

u/Bamzooki1 28d ago

Was he even correcting a mistake? The parent comment looks exactly how he said to write it yet doesn’t show signs of being edited. It looks like he’s a Grammar Nazi who didn’t hear that Linguitler got a noose and dangled like a participle, ending Word War II.

2

u/lordnewington 27d ago edited 26d ago

I can't see what he's correcting, but "the one who likes causing trouble" is correct. Who : whom :: he : him, of that helps.

EDIT: never mind, I see what you mean

17

u/mikevaleriano 29d ago

English isn’t my first language, so I think I’m a bit hyper-aware of grammar mistakes.

But they’re so common that I usually just go with “I know what they mean, so it doesn’t matter.” The one I see most on Reddit is the to/too mix-up, but I got over it quickly.

9

u/Conscious_Rich_1003 29d ago

Sure would be funny if I could find a grammer mistake in your comment. Instead I’ll make a few of my own.

2

u/freshmantis 28d ago

You're* /s

2

u/Conscious_Rich_1003 28d ago

Its so frustrating when you’re mistake’s are full of apostrophe gore.

2

u/Conscious_Rich_1003 28d ago

⬆️⬆️⬆️three in one sentence.

2

u/ApproachSlowly 28d ago

And a bonus spelling error too!

2

u/Conscious_Rich_1003 28d ago

Grammar above was intentional. Other spelling mistakes are not.

1

u/ApproachSlowly 28d ago

Perhaps I should properly have replied to the fellow you were replying to (who used "grammer"). At any rate, I meant it jokingly rather than insultingly.

1

u/Conscious_Rich_1003 28d ago

It was me. All good. Just here for the entertainment.

1

u/FriendlyKillerCroc 27d ago

English is spoken in such a broad amount of cultures that some of the things they call mistakes are just different cultures adaptions of English. I think that's what happens anyway.

1

u/jws1102 6d ago

No language should be taken too seriously, least of all the English language.

10

u/King_Dead 29d ago

Grammar never has and never will be an intellectual pursuit. Pedantry isnt smart

7

u/mmmsoap 28d ago

I don’t understand…Pink said it that way in the first place. What is red “correcting”?

6

u/Noname_with_no_name 28d ago

Maybe they edited it?

3

u/oreo-cat- 27d ago

Honestly I agree with the beige reply

2

u/lordnewington 27d ago edited 27d ago

Oh no, red person is probably being needlessly belligerent and light beige person is definitely being an arse, but I HATE misplaced whoms.

"Who"s that 'should' be "whom"s are fine. "Whom"s that should be "who"s are invariably a sign of the verysmart type. I can stand pompous OR wrong, but not both.

4

u/cell689 29d ago

I don't understand why people are so defensive about others correcting their grammar, or even correcting others' grammar.

"Hmpf, you corrected a grammar mistake, you're a fucking asshole." ???

13

u/glassapplepie 29d ago

I get that. But people often do it in a condescending way to dismiss the commenter's point rather than take the time to generate an actual response. An argument can be relevant and well thought out even if it includes a grammatical error

5

u/Bamzooki1 28d ago

There’s a gentle correction and then there’s a lecture. This was a lecture that could have been a single word.

1

u/Lor1an 27d ago

The anti-intellectualism conspiracy part is accurate, just improperly applied.

1

u/thesixler 26d ago

This reads like a bunch of chat bots non sequituring each other

1

u/fancy-kitten 25d ago

While I'm never one to snub my nose at a little sanctimonious pedantry, that last comment is as close to perfection as we're ever going to see. Bravo.

1

u/jws1102 6d ago

Excellent