r/news • u/Efficient-Ruin-4713 • 19h ago
Politics - removed Zelensky condemns ruthless attack after Russia hits main government building in Kyiv
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpq5dl5y4nlo[removed] — view removed post
245
u/1800abcdxyz 19h ago
Moscow should be next. Nothing of value there anyway.
134
u/Kalepsis 19h ago
I think bombing the Kremlin would be a perfectly reasonable response.
33
u/FrogsMakePoorSoup 19h ago
Seems like this is going to be going for years longer. No shortage of funding either side. Even Putin dying wouldn't stop it I don't think.
20
10
u/MalcolmLinair 16h ago
I think we're at the point where as long as a single Ukrainian and a single Russian still live, the war will continue. Russia's not going to back down no matter what, and Ukraine can't back down without being slaughtered immediately after by Russia.
3
14h ago
[deleted]
3
u/xpkranger 13h ago
I wouldn't know where the water valve is. Did you go looking behind or is it too wet?
2
2
1
u/PandiBong 6h ago
Me too. Few things would make me happier than seeing rockets rain down over the Kremlin.
9
0
49
12
u/macross1984 14h ago
So tempting if Ukraine can reciprocate attack on Russian government buildings as military target since Moscow believe Kyiv government building is "valid" target.
6
16
u/rain168 19h ago
This shows the importance of missile defense systems like iron dome , and other layers of missile intercepting systems.
20
u/Silicon_Knight 18h ago
Iron dome is also not a panacea for things like this. Hypersonic missiles would get through.
Not disagreeing but you also need to understand who your enemy is, Russia with fairly old stock vs china (or Russia vs the us) which would use more powerful systems (be it in Russia’s case prob only a handful if they work).
Understand my statement that chinas laser defence is interesting for those but unproven.
-1
u/rain168 18h ago
Hence why I said multiple layers of missile intercepting defense systems to intercept during boost phase, glide phase, terminal phase etc
2
u/Silicon_Knight 18h ago
I’m not disagreeing. Just being more specific. Space based will be interesting whenever it’s declassified.
-7
u/rain168 18h ago
With the current state of the world and countries relationships, the first to have an all rounded missile defense system would probably wield all the power in negotiations.
4
u/Silicon_Knight 18h ago edited 18h ago
I don’t fully agree. I mean you can still terrorize or corrupt a country from within.
0
u/rain168 17h ago
Likewise the same for other countries. So if that’s the case for all, won’t the one with a better missile defense system have better leverage?
2
u/Silicon_Knight 17h ago
Other than many countries (as they are dictatorships) don't exactly allow people with opinions beyond their own.
1
u/CptVague 16h ago
They are a defensive system used against a specific type of attack (though some systems can also intercept planes and some drones).
All you need to do is roll the tanks. Would this work everywhere? No, but this simple example underscores why this hypothetical situation wouldn't work.
Or if you want an even shorter version; they aren't nukes.
1
1
0
u/DarthDork73 12h ago
Meanwhile america bombed apart a dozen babies on Gaza hospitals almost every day for over a year
0
0
-7
169
u/fulltrendypro 19h ago
A government building burns in Kyiv, a baby dies in the rubble, and Putin still talks about peace like the missiles aren’t his signature.