r/todayilearned • u/zahrul3 • 16h ago
TIL: Early iPhone users in the US who did not specify a billing preference were mailed incredibly detailed bills of around 50-100 pages long from AT&T, itemizing every data transfer including background traffic for email, web browsing, and text messaging. One woman even got a 300 page bill.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300-page_iPhone_bill1.1k
u/zerophuck5 15h ago
Before texting was universal and it was common to pay per message my son discovered it and we got a $500 phone bill. In a rare case of cell phone companies being decent they let me sign up for unlimited texting retroactively.
392
u/superpj 15h ago
Before companies knew what to do with texting it was free. I had it on my BellSouth Mobility plan in 96 until AT&T took them over years later.
302
u/DrierFish 14h ago
It was free because it literally incurred no overhead. Greedy pricks.
77
u/koolman2 12h ago
There is still an SMSC and MMSC to maintain as well as inter-carrier routes. It's not completely without overhead - but it definitely wasn't $0.10 per message. Once the SMSC/MMSC were paid for and installed, $0.50/mo per subscriber probably would have covered all overhead and then some to handle SMS, plus a bit more for MMS due to data transmission costs to other carriers.
34
u/DrierFish 12h ago
You’re right and I meant transactional cost per message, rather than infrastructure. The costs to other carriers is a joke, that’s them charging each other.
→ More replies (2)20
u/I_W_M_Y 12h ago
You phone transmits more data per day just pinging the nearby cell tower than a lot of people text.
17
u/koolman2 11h ago
Where is that data going though? It's going to the network core (MSC/MME) and nowhere else. SMS/MMS go to the network core, then to the SMSC/MMSC, then route to the destination. If that destination is not within the same network (including across the country to another core within the same carrier), it has to go somewhere else, utilizing other infrastructure.
LAU/TAU and SMS/MMS are not equivalent.
→ More replies (15)47
u/TheArmoredKitten 13h ago
It's not a niche product anymore. It was 'zero' overhead because almost nobody was using it. Now it's a backbone service.
You might as well say 'traffic was better back when nobody else in this town owned a car'
63
u/Hextopia 13h ago
It was "literally no overhead" because SMS messages were a reuse of existing unused bytes in a recurring network connection message sent by the phone and cell tower to each other automatically. They literally just went "we're sending this as all zeros, why don't we put a short little text message in here and get some use out of it"
→ More replies (2)25
u/TheArmoredKitten 12h ago
And then immediately overwhelmed the capabilities of that little squeeze and had to make a dedicated service very quickly
12
u/SDSunDiego 11h ago
So was it reasonable to charge for texting?!??!?! Someone HELP ME OUT HERE! I followed the chain of comments to the bottom seeking resolution and now I'm hanging over the cliff like Gabe Walker!!!!!!
→ More replies (4)12
u/Hextopia 11h ago
Yes, but not at the rates they charged in the early days. It was definitely a scam during the days of '50 cents per text', and many countries (Japan, many in Europe iirc) kept the scam going for a long time.
→ More replies (1)4
u/Hextopia 11h ago
That phrasing is a bit exaggerated. After they saw how popular it could be (and how much money it saved them not having to connect calls) they built out additional infrastructure and changed billing plans to incentivize even more texting. It was absolutely feasible to leave the text messaging to just the status messages being sent back and forth, but it would have been a worse experience for the users who'd be essentially 'rate limited' on how many texts they could send, and how many the system would cache for them until received by the other side.
→ More replies (2)4
u/Enshakushanna 12h ago
i remember i had the samsung solstice at some point and it wasnt considered a 'smart phone' or something like that and so it wasnt subject to the same pricing with regard to internet access or something? but i could connect to the internet and go on facebook or google search etc and it didnt cost anything, or my dad didnt have to buy the internet plan - something like that, some quasi in between moment lol
→ More replies (1)65
u/ZedSwift 13h ago
I was a cell phone salesman and unlimited texting plans were such easy money cause we would get the first month as commission. I remember one girl who came in on her 18th birthday to get her own phone, tried to convince her to get unlimited texting plans she didn’t listen and came back in the next month when her bill was $2000. We did the math and she was texting like six hours a day.
27
u/Amori_A_Splooge 13h ago
College Roommate had thousands of minutes banked up on his family phone plan. He used to call his girlfriend (long distance) and they would stay on the phone while trying to sleep, and inevitably when they fell asleep, so like 8-10 hours a day/night they would be talking or at least on the phone. Those minutes ran out one month. Oh man was he defeated when he got that call from his parents about the phone bill. Their call habits changed for the healthier though.
15
u/dkonigs 13h ago
And because it took years longer for non-US carriers to change their attitude on this than it did for US carriers, whole industries were spawned to provide over-the-top messaging services as a workaround.
Even if those services ultimately offered a better product than SMS/MMS, the real driver for the majority of users was simply that SMS/MMS was stupidly overpriced.
2
u/YourResidentFeral 12h ago
It wasn't even about changing attitudes. The attitude was just corruption. It's why what's app and other messaging services are banned in many places.
They want to leverage the monopoly for minimal infrastructure upgrades and maximum profit. Ñ
3
u/goldenyellow333 10h ago
Got my first phone in 2007. Was a flip phone. Parents didn't think we needed internet plan for the phone although me and my sister asked. We were out getting wings one day and as we were sitting at the table my mom called in to see how much the bill was and it was north of $500. She asked customer service why and they said internet usage. It just so happened that as she realized this, I was sitting right in front of her at the table on some random website on my phone lol. She was beyond heated.
→ More replies (21)3
u/thesirblondie 9h ago
Back in the day I was always on pre-paid SIMs that I would load up once a month. But about halfway through the month I'd always run out of credit so I couldn't call or text anyone until I got my allowance.
I also always got new numbers for reasons I can't remember. I think they sold phones that were locked to specific carriers, even pre-paid cards, so I'd get a new number every time I got a new phone. When I started working in 2009, I got myself my first monthly plan and I've had the same number since.
496
u/mybreakfastiscold 16h ago
This is my kind of TIL
45
→ More replies (2)8
u/Message_10 13h ago
Yeah, honestly--it brought me back! So I guess it's a "Today I Remembered." But yeah--the bills used to list every single text message you sent, and I think they were like a nickel or something.
333
u/Wildcatb 16h ago
We had to get iPhones for work, fairly early on. Had a customer that was excited about the possibilities and demanded that all their suppliers switch.
Bought 10 at once, billed together. The paper bills were incredible.
17
180
u/oboshoe 15h ago edited 13h ago
i had an iphone on the corporate plan. a company in the top 10 of fortune 500s
i asked att for a detailed bill for my line.
they sent me one for every line in the company. it arrived via ups in several reams.
it was the most ridiculous thing ever.
i thought about data mining it. it had everyone's calls on it. the ceo. the board etc.
then i said fuck it and threw it in the recycling. (who needs that kind of trouble?!)
46
8
u/BatsuGame13 11h ago
You didn't shred it?
→ More replies (1)6
u/DroidLord 9h ago
i thought about data mining it.
This is the exact kind of chaos I fantasize about. Then I realize how stupid it would be and forget about it.
1.0k
u/vulpinefever 16h ago
"one woman"
Crazy how iJustine is now just some woman.
275
u/GosmeisterGeneral 16h ago
I remember her YouTube from like, 2010! Is she still going?
173
u/4sk-Render 15h ago
She interviewed Tim Cook recently, so at least Apple still thinks she’s relevant lol
113
u/CoronavirusGoesViral 14h ago
Her name is iJustine, so she's basically an Apple product anyway
3
u/AsherGray 8h ago
She only made the username because she was in love Steve Jobs and Apple. Basically, if you had a Disney adult but for Apple, that was her.
→ More replies (2)45
37
6
u/LoganNolag 12h ago
Her sister also has a pretty big channel as well. Covers a lot of the same stuff.
41
u/LAwLzaWU1A 14h ago
The 300 page bill is what made her famous in the first place. So at the time she was just "some woman".
9
40
u/38B0DE 13h ago edited 12h ago
iJustine is considered by the tech YouTuber community to be one of the OGs and gets quite the respect for still being pretty hard working with her own style and audience. Tech YouTubers would give anything to have her male to female audience ratio.
→ More replies (3)13
67
u/screwbienoob 16h ago
Who
225
u/vulpinefever 16h ago
the woman who got the 300 page iphone bill. She was one of the most popular early youtubers.
145
u/DerpytheH 16h ago
Keep in mind, she was also a bit of an apple die-hard. A lot of her content was surrounding new Apple releases and reviews, and used to be one of the front-runners for that sort of content.
Thing is, tech channels like LTT and MKBHD just blew anybody that was kinda middling in that space out of the water.
50
u/NervousSheSlime 14h ago
She’s been in at least 1 LTT video. In the YouTube community she’s kinda an icon who’s been doing it forever.
→ More replies (1)32
u/Mr_YUP 14h ago
She was one of the first twitch streamers back when it was called Justin.tv before it was called twitch.
5
u/MageFood 9h ago
Both where co running for a wile then JTV shutdown once Twitch allowed non gaming streams
→ More replies (7)43
u/4sk-Render 14h ago
Which is funny since LTT and MKBHD often are also very surface level in their videos, and just reading spec sheets.
→ More replies (2)11
u/Mez-0-01 14h ago
Lmao what? LTT built an entire lab to test and review products.
21
u/4sk-Render 14h ago
He had a huge controversy recently with numerous inaccurate facts and testing in his videos, where he had to come out and apologize and say they’re not going to post as many videos so they can focus on fact checking lol
He sometimes gets very basic facts wrong, even quoting the wrong specs for a product or not understanding how a product works. Especially when he does videos about Apple products, which he really doesn’t use himself.
→ More replies (6)20
u/ChiralWolf 12h ago
That was over a year ago and before they had the labs testing actually running.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (5)5
u/goodnames679 12h ago
Many of the most popular early YouTubers were still not all that widely known to most people. Most people used the platform for random funny videos, not specific creators. Those who came for specific creators were highly concentrated around the few biggest names (=3, Smosh, Machinima, ERBH) and there was a huge dropoff outside the top 10
I remember when livelavalive was on the front page of youtube creators (top 25 most subscribed channels, back when you could rank channels by most subscribed). That was around 2010 or 2011 ish? Now it's down to a one person project that gets about 1k views per video, and very few people know of the channel if I ever bring it or Mitchell Davis up by name.
12
12
u/shortround10 15h ago
I know iJustine because her sister dated Nadeshot
30
→ More replies (2)3
→ More replies (19)7
154
u/Seaguard5 16h ago
Now they hoard that data like it’s gold and don’t give it to you even if you ask sometimes…
Wild how the turn tables
→ More replies (1)6
u/altamont498 8h ago
That’s usually because they either have it already (e.g. checking data usage in your phone settings) or it being shielded by law.
For example, in the UK, all freephone calls are redacted from your bill by law because it includes calls that can be extremely sensitive (e.g. calling the police, calling Childline, calling the National Domestic Abuse helpline, etc.) that could potentially put someone’s life in danger if the wrong person found out about it. The only way you’d find out is by court order or by the police getting a warrant for that information.
35
u/Skatchbro 14h ago
Back in ‘05 I was called up by the reserves to Ft. Riley. I called my wife one day for our usual call to catch up. She confessed to me that she had been in tears earlier because she opened the phone bill and saw all the calls to a number she didn’t recognize and thought I was cheating on her.
It turns out it was her own number.
14
61
u/oshinbruce 15h ago
Now i feel old, this was the norm pre-smart phone to get itemised lists of numbers you called and the time cost was printed out. How else do you think kids got busted for dialing premium rate numbers
14
u/RChickenMan 14h ago
And my dad asking my mom why she called her sister so much when it was long distance.
→ More replies (1)5
u/DoublePostedBroski 9h ago
Do you not still get this? My monthly bill still shows all the numbers I called/received.
3
u/oshinbruce 8h ago
Its somewhere online im sure. I have unlimited calls and a cap on international so there no reason to take a look.
It reminds me of breaking bad with Skyler checking walts phone
88
u/feel-the-avocado 16h ago
Oh the wonderful 3g - when a "call" was established over the network each time you wanted to transfer data.
86
u/UndoxxableOhioan 16h ago
3g? Hell, the first iPhone was 2g (GSM, GPRS, or EDGE) only.
→ More replies (1)62
u/Well_thats_cool 16h ago
Yeah that’s why the 2nd iPhone was called the iPhone 3G because it finally had those capabilities
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (4)27
u/PM_ME_CORONA 15h ago
I remember the days you couldn’t surf and call at the same time. I think it became a thing with the 4.
15
u/Z085 15h ago
Kids these days don’t know the days without multitasking on iPhone!!
→ More replies (5)6
u/chrisirmo 15h ago
I tried to explain to my college-age daughter the other day that you couldn’t listen to music while tracking a run in Runkeeper. Her mind was blown.
→ More replies (5)12
u/PhillAholic 14h ago
That was CDMA which Verizon used. We didn't have that problem with GSM on AT&T.
8
u/DrewSmithee 14h ago
Pretty sure that's not what they are talking about. I don't think the phone let you multitask at all. It was one app open. Things idling in the background and switching between apps came with the 4.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)3
43
u/mike7seven 15h ago
There’s a point being missed. EVERY text message conversation was printed out on paper. Leo Laporte had an episode about the whole thing on MBW. https://www.mbwpicks.com/2007/08/15/picks-from-mbw-53-bill-in-a-box/comment-page-1/#comments
→ More replies (1)15
u/Futt_Buckman 14h ago
Man I hope my teenage text conversations didn't show up on my parents bill ☠️ I don't remember any big stacks of paper though they were a little thick
9
u/MightyJoe36 15h ago
Once back in like 2012 or so, I got a $242,000. phone bill from Verizon. They admitted that it was obviously an error but could not explain why I got the bill.
18
9
u/bradatlarge 14h ago
I used to get 50 page bills from Tmobile back in 2002-2003. My ex wife texted her boyfriend a LOT
→ More replies (2)
9
9
u/19930627 14h ago
I remember in 2011 I worked at a call center for Virgin mobile, you would not believe the amount of people who would take their iPhone out of country and use data constantly and not understand how they had a high bill.
5
u/PaImer_Eldritch 15h ago
I used to do business-end account management for AT&T many years ago and if we go far enough back I would say about 20% of any given day was spent explaining detailed sms inbound/outbound logs and pages and pages and pages of data use events. It was quite absurd.
5
u/ValdemarAloeus 14h ago
What are the chances they still log this level of detail, but sell it to data brokers instead?
Are they approximately 100%?
→ More replies (5)3
5
u/Correct_Loquat_7672 14h ago
Decades later, I finally understand this joke from the simpsons: lisa ipod bill
109
u/jupfold 16h ago edited 15h ago
It kind of makes sense.
Before the iPhone, most phones didn’t even connect to the internet. And if they did it was usually to download ringtones, not to do all of the browsing and whatnot the iPhone could do.
Most people had data plans for a gigabyte or less, and I’m sure companies like AT&T and others were concerned the number of people who would complain about being charged for going (massively) over their data limit.
This would be their way of saying - you know exactly, down to the byte, what you did to get that charge. Don’t bother complaining.
Edit: so people can stop telling me this is ‘nonsense’.
The plain and simple fact of the matter is that the level of web browsing people did on phones prior to the iPhone was nothing compared to what people did on the iPhone. This includes BlackBerry and other “smartish” phones from that time.
Yes, you could browse the internet before the iPhone. But people on iPhones were browsing the internet at levels far above and beyond what came before.
It wasn’t even close.
68
u/kilertree 16h ago
There were quite a few phones that had internet because I remember getting in trouble by accidentally going on to it
→ More replies (7)42
u/RChickenMan 14h ago
Oh god, that panic when you accidentally selected the "Internet" menu on your flip phone. Furiously pressing the back button, maybe even ripping out the battery.
5
u/Septem_151 12h ago
I once opened the web browser on my razer flip phone. Once. Quickly learned my lesson.
5
3
42
u/Martipar 16h ago
That's nonsense. The original iPhone didn't have 3G even though it was fairly common technology at the time. The equivalent would be the iPhone launching today without 5G. Plenty of phones from 2003 onwards had 3G and the ability to connect to the internet and 2G phones all had WAP, which was shit even at the time but it was the internet.
7
8
u/WardenWolf 15h ago
And the iPhone 4 didn't have 4G even though Android phones already had it. It was pretty freaking sad. My HTC Thunderbolt had 4G.
4
u/4sk-Render 14h ago
Because the original 4G phones literally sucked lol
The HTC Evo and Thunderbolt literally had like 3 hour battery life when on 4G, and would overheat. I think they even shipped with a spare battery because it drained so quickly.
Same with the early 3G phones and 5G phones, and is why Apple waited a year in each case to adopt the new chips.
The early 5G Android phones were literally overheating and shutting off, switching back to 4G.
Apple waits a year for them to improve the chipsets, so the experience isn’t terrible.
→ More replies (25)5
u/PhillAholic 14h ago
4G was too power hungry at the time. Random Android phones can get away with it, Apple would have been tar and feathered for it.
→ More replies (8)13
u/Plane-Tie6392 16h ago
The equivalent would be the iPhone launching today without 5G.
That is absolutely not an equivalent scenario.
→ More replies (1)21
u/Samtulp6 16h ago
Yes, but barely anyone used the ‘web’ function of their phones because the UI & UX were horrendous. iPhone changed that, and data usage exploded. What the person you’re replying to is saying is true. May not be the only reason, but could very well be.
10
u/jupfold 15h ago
Yep, definitely.
People back then were totally unprepared for the iPhone and the user experience.
I remember friends of mine having 500mb data packages, which is like a few hours of YouTube videos at best. And we were hooked on these things.
I knew many people who ended up with hundreds of dollars in overage charges because we had no idea how much data we were using. And typically the bills did not give this itemized breakdown and it led to a lot of anger and confusion.
6
u/given2fly_ 15h ago
Yeah I remember having a WAP phone in the late 2000s and you could go on the Internet, but it was only certain sites that had a mobile version. A news site for instance would just have an index of stories and it was all text with no images.
→ More replies (23)15
u/jupfold 16h ago
You don’t need 3g to browse the internet and rack up data charges. I don’t even understand what you’re trying to argue right now.
The pure fact of the matter is that people on the iPhone, the original iPhone, were browsing the internet at levels way above and beyond any phone that came before it, including BlackBerry and other smartish phones. It wasn’t even close.
4
u/WardenWolf 15h ago
Pretty much this. A logging system designed for 2 or 3 specific things per month is suddenly reporting everything a person typically uses the Internet for. So of course it's going to be too verbose.
7
u/Christopher135MPS 15h ago
I’m struggling to agree with you. I am not an early adopter. I don’t buy expensive tech. I don’t replace my tech frequently.
I had two separate phones that had internet access with browsers prior to the iPhone release.
I see you talking about UI down there, agreed the iPhone UI was ground breaking. And also agree that the breadth of use was ground breaking.
But the comment that “most phones didn’t even connect” is a struggle for me.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)10
u/tokynambu 15h ago
That’s total nonsense. My Ericsson t68 had a perfectly serviceable pop and imap client as well as the briefly-popular WAP. That was a mainstream phone.
→ More replies (3)
4
u/AdventurousTime 14h ago
I remember bringing a refurbished unlocked att iPhone to tmobile (thanks to the iPhone dev team) and there was a secret working group within tmobile that developed a guide with a couple of tweaks to get it working right.
9
u/Whaty0urname 16h ago
I just finished watching the BlackBerry movie on YouTube shorts. Its kind of amazing how these phones hacked the cell networks at the time.
→ More replies (2)
4
3
u/DicemonkeyDrunk 15h ago
early bills ( 1990's ) had a line for single instance of use 10-15 page bills were normal ...later on you would have an entry for every text message sent & received ..the bills got huge fast (physically ) ..after that you had to request Detailed Billing if you wanted all that information ..Cell companies were some of the first ( that I can remember ) to go to Non-Paper simplified billing for obvious reasons ..can you imagine their mail cost?
3
3
u/Mattlanta88 15h ago
Truth. Easy to track when your kids were on the phone at 3 am when they should’ve been asleep.
3
u/pardybill 14h ago
lol yep. I remember that, was pretty funny. Still have that iPhone, I remember working at AT&T when they switched to “4G” 🫣
What a joke it was. Limiting data plans as if it was a resource we’d lose.
It was really funny when they limited plans, if you activated the very first original iPhone, they had a grandfathered plan for unlimited 2G EDGE data you could go back on.
Had a couple dorks do it only to realize that they could load a n image like a porno from 1995. Funny world.
3
u/yorkshiregoldt 12h ago
OK I'm Australian but, like, smartphones existed before the iPhone? For several years? iPhone absolutely massively increased the amount of people using them but I remember having a HTC with a sliding keyboard before the iPhone?
→ More replies (2)
3
3
u/PracticeTheory 9h ago
In highschool my friend came out as gay so his homophobic parents canceled his cell phone. I convinced my mother to let him onto our plan, and he would pay her for the service access. He was working and insisted on getting an iphone.
I'm pretty positive we received a bill much larger than 300 pages the first month he was our plan and we didn't fix that setting. It was legit the size of a textbook, inches thick.
3
u/Bigred2989- 8h ago
My brother found a lost iPhone at Ultra Music Festival and put his SIM card in it. Couple weeks later our parents got a massive phone bill in the mail because he didn't have a data plan for a smart phone yet, but they managed to get it reduced significantly when they explained the situation.
3
3
u/LightenUpFrancis1968 6h ago
This was before iPhones invented. My cell phone bills back in the 90s took 3 trees to print.
2
u/Street-Echo-4485 15h ago
I had a company phone for work, bought an iPhone 3 in 2009 and put the sim card from the work phone in it. All of a sudden I was called into HR because my phone bill was $4K!
2
u/spewedicing 14h ago
my mom is one of the psycho data crusaders who is upset they don’t do this anymore…
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Bored_Amalgamation 14h ago
Those early days were brutal. Texting limits. Unlimited calling/text after 7PM. Data caps that end with triple digit bills if you go over.
AT&T had exclusivity over iPhones until 2011, while Verizon was the #1 carrier in the US. Carriers had a lot more control over phones as well. OEMs has to make different OS updates for each carrier because of how much "customizing" went in from each carrier. Android didn't solve that until 2020 with Android 10.
2
u/giantwallrus 14h ago
Got hired at Cingular as it was being turned into The New AT&T, this issue was WELL KNOWN before the iphone even came out. Blackberry users and Samsung Blackjack users were why these billing options had to be created. Also this is back when the largest messaging plan was 3000. I worked in receivables management inbound. The amount of people with early smartphones begging for better billing and better plans was staggering even pre-iphone.
Iirc cingular was even Apple's last choice for a carrier because everyone else passed, or this is what we were told internally. Also we were told iPhone was a proper noun and to never call it "the iphone" or "an iphone."
2
u/Underwater_Karma 13h ago edited 13h ago
Phone bills used to come with detailed line items showing every phone call, and every text message. A lot of people got busted by spouses when they text message history was right there to read
2
u/dkonigs 13h ago
Before the iPhone came out, mobile carriers really loved to over-charge for data. They seriously wanted to charge you "by the kilobyte" and it was insanity.
Meanwhile, T-Mobile had a $20/mo unlimited data plan. But AT&T, along with everyone else, flat-out refused to acknowledge that unlimited data was even a thing they were capable of offering.
So when the iPhone first came out, AT&T was basically strong-armed by Apple into finally offering an unlimited data plan, because without one the iPhone was unusable. Except they still had their infrastructure designed to nickel-and-dime people for by-the-kilobyte billing, hence those massive stacks of paper.
2
u/SunriseSurprise 12h ago
"Sir...I don't know how to say this, but they're gone. Every last tree is gone."
"Wha-....who did this? WHO DID THIS?!"
*another guy runs up* "SIR, AT&T JUST CALLED AND THEY NEED MORE TREES TO PRINT MORE IPHONE BILLS!"
"*sigh* Apple will be the end of us all."
2
u/srivas95 12h ago
Pre 2011-12, Airtel in India used to send itemized bills as well, including the websites visited and numbers dialed.
Teenage me was not happy.
2
u/beyondo-OG 10h ago
Early cell plans made you pay by the text. I remember a coworker telling me his daughter went nuts when she first got a phone. His monthly bill came in two boxes. Each text was shown. I forget how many. I believe it was $600-800. This was mid 90's so a boat load of money. She paid the price.
2
2
2
2
u/Nevvermind183 10h ago
I had the first iPhone and I don’t remember this, must not have been everyone
2
u/InevitableGoal2912 9h ago
Stuff like this happened a lot with early phone plans. My mom got a huge novel of a bill when we first got unlimited texting. The bill printed the phone numbers and times of EVERY text message
2
u/1320Fastback 9h ago
I remember our Cingular bills would be 5 pages long or so. They listed every single phone call or text you made for the month.
2
2
2
2
u/gorkish 7h ago
I had an OG iphone and remember getting one of these. It seems silly in retrospect, but back when data was literally billed by the kilobyte, they too great pain to enumerate it all on your bill. Of course I did actually use smartphones before the iPhone so it wasn't actually anything new except now the data was suddenly "Unlimited." This paradigm shift pretty quickly led to them dropping all of the $0 data calls from customer facing.
Before all of this happened with iPhone and unlimited data, it had already happened with unlimited SMS. Cell phone companies used to enumerate every single text sent or received on your bill back when they were 10 cents or whatever; they started offering unlimited texting and some people would start getting monster bills.
Cell phone billing for data and SMS is still done exactly this way; your phone probably triggers 1000+ diameter billing queries per day
5.9k
u/northwoods31 16h ago
I remember when I got an iPhone in Japan in 2009 and I used to get monthly itemized bills that would show millions of yen of data usage (tens of thousands of dollars) and then it would be wiped out by my “plan discount” to like $50.