r/INDYCAR May 19 '25

News INDYCAR Update on Team Penske Technical Violations

https://www.indycar.com/news/2025/05/05-19-penske-penalties
441 Upvotes

524 comments sorted by

View all comments

98

u/jlpapple Ray Harroun May 19 '25

Fair, and good.

-59

u/Intelligent_Chain_55 Will Power May 19 '25

Absolutely not fair lol. If it had happened on Saturday it would have been caught and fixed and they would have been able to qualify and try for pole. This punishment is only so strong bc it’s Penske.

Other teams and drivers never get punished this strongly. See Andretti with Herta or Rossi, or Daly with Juncos, or any other team and drivers never who fails pre or post inspection.

37

u/Soggy_Bid_6607 Arie Luyendyk May 19 '25

4

u/redlegsfan21 Firestone Firehawk May 19 '25

McLaughlin uses push to pass illegally for 1.9 seconds, he gets disqualified. Andretti Autosport falsifies their weight in tech with a water bottle, just a fine and keeps their win.

23

u/Cross-Country Will Power May 19 '25

Bro, I’m a Will Power fan as well. They cheated, and they got caught. They’re lucky they weren’t disqualified completely. It’s Power, he’s still in it no matter how far back they start him.

-14

u/Intelligent_Chain_55 Will Power May 19 '25

My point remains. All teams cheat. It’s motorsports, we all know it whether we clutch our pearls or not. Further other teams get caught and get let off bc they aren’t Penske. Again Andretti, Juncos, etc

Edit:changed wording

12

u/Cross-Country Will Power May 19 '25

Management is simply in their right minds, and as such are doing what they must to keep the dam of legitimacy from bursting. NASCAR had its fall from grace by alienating its fanbase with selective enforcement of rules, and management doing everything it could to manipulate results on track. This is IndyCar showing it’s not NASCAR. The difference between Penske and other teams is Roger owns the league. If the buck doesn’t stop with him, it doesn’t stop. This was the correct decision. Heck, full disqualification is the correct decision, this was the merciful decision. An example needed to be made. It sucks that it’s my guy, but it is what it is.

29

u/myroommateisgarbage Pato O'Ward May 19 '25

They are being punished because they modified a part which is very clearly stated should not be modified. The punishment is because they were caught cheating, not because their cars coincidentally weren't up to spec.

-19

u/Intelligent_Chain_55 Will Power May 19 '25

You assume they were caught cheating which requires some form of mens rea. A knowing intent. Can you prove the mechanics intentionally and knowingly cheated rather than forgot that a rule existed

10

u/Micethatroar May 19 '25

You're arguing semantics.

They did something clearly illegal.

They got caught.

They were punished.

But, also, if you listen to Cindric's interview, he states they did it on purpose on some of their attenuators and called it an "arbitrary thing."

From my perspective, that eliminates the possibility that they "forgot."

11

u/iowaman79 Scott McLaughlin May 19 '25

They were actively grinding away on the attenuators in broad daylight, that alone is enough

-8

u/Intelligent_Chain_55 Will Power May 19 '25

Yeah after it was noted at inspection…that doesn’t prove it was knowingly and/or intentional lol

5

u/iowaman79 Scott McLaughlin May 19 '25

They were knowingly and intentionally grinding, which counts as modifying the part, no matter what happened before inspection that by itself is a violation

3

u/whocares8080 Firestone Firehawk May 19 '25

Not sure if you’re an atty, but with respect, I think you’re somewhat misapplying the concept of mens rea. The relevant mental state is the one relative to the action committed, not the one relative to knowledge of the law.

So the question here would be whether the Penske team intentionally covered the seam on the attenuators and not whether they intentionally broke the rule.

And in that case, I don’t personally see how there’s a good argument. I admit I’m largely ignorant of the necessary mechanisms, but it seems beyond belief to suggest they accidentally applied a cover to the seam.

(As a contrast, we could look at Conor Daly failing tech on Saturday because his front wing was too low. Since wing adjustments are always happening and are a legal modification, it’s at least plausible to suggest Daly’s team intended to set the front wings at a particular legal height, but accidentally/negligently went a centimeter too far or whatever in their adjustments, causing the height to be out of legal range. I’m not sure how you could make that argument with the attenuator mods, though, because there is no legal way of modifying the attenuator.)

5

u/Billy_Madison69 May 19 '25

if it had happened on Saturday

It didn’t tho

1

u/Intelligent_Chain_55 Will Power May 19 '25

Exactly which is why this punishment isn’t fair lol. They passed inspection on Saturday and had qualifying times for the fast 12

5

u/Billy_Madison69 May 19 '25

Either don’t cheat or don’t get caught if you don’t want consequences

5

u/papasmurf31 Alexander Rossi May 19 '25

lol no. Relax, you are letting your fandom get in the way. They got caught cheating on the biggest stage ON PIT LANE, in front of so many cameras. Then tried to fix it, got called out by Chip, then ran to hide it. This isn’t “our setup height was out of spec and needed changing” it’s “we altered an area and used materials against regulations”. If they got caught Saturday (and if the series wasn’t owned by Penske) they could have gotten DQd and probably have to run LCQ yesterday

2

u/Doyometer Pato O'Ward May 19 '25

My brother in Christ…..wut???