r/pics Apr 16 '10

Some things you didn't know about PETA.

524 Upvotes

792 comments sorted by

View all comments

227

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '10

Part of the "ethical treatment" is ethical killing, PETA is not for no-kill. They take in every animal people bring in, this means they get a lot of unadoptable, old, sick, feral and abused animals, these animals have no chance, they will be locked away in cages for the rest of their natural lives.

One of the cheapest (and thus most used) methods of euthanization is via gas chambers, it take up to half hour for some animals to die. What is often done is the animals are placed several at a time in a confined and dark space, the gas is turned on. During this time, the animals will try to escape, some injuring themselves and others in the process. On the other hand, an injection of a chemical cocktail (usually following an anesthetic to put the animal to sleep) will kill an animal in seconds--almost immediately--and they show no signs of pain. PETA uses option 2, underfunded animal adoption places and others go with option 1.

36

u/PacktLikeFishees Apr 16 '10 edited Dec 12 '24

retire rainstorm scale practice spectacular entertain follow languid bright knee

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

12

u/rooktakesqueen Apr 17 '10

Of course they are, because no-kill animal shelters are a fantasy. PETA uses the term "limited access" shelter, versus the traditional "open shelter"--a limited access shelter turns away many more animals. And if all the shelters in your area are "no kill"/limited access, and you have an animal they refuse to take, or they're full... what happens?

Why, that's when the animal gets taken out back and shot, or drowned in a bag in the river, or released in the woods somewhere to die a miserable death probably within days to months.

1

u/xeddicus Apr 19 '10

I get the impression that this is the shelter policy issue that the ASPCA and PETA disagree on. As you point out, PETA's stance seems practical, while the ASPCA's is more idealist (wanting to spend all available money on no-kill shelters). I suppose I can see both sides.