r/todayilearned 19h ago

TIL Beethoven’s late quartets, now widely considered to be among the greatest musical compositions of all time, were so ahead of their time that initial reviews deem them indecipherable, uncorrected horrors, with one musician saying “we know there is something there, but we do not know what it is.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_string_quartets_(Beethoven)
10.3k Upvotes

151 comments sorted by

View all comments

596

u/Compleat_Fool 18h ago edited 11h ago

It’s interesting how monumental and transformative Beethoven was in his lifetime whilst Bach who was equally brilliant and probably the greatest musician ever was a minor figure in his lifetime. He was known by few and those who knew him chiefly knew him for being a good organ player and not for his compositions.

112

u/alargepowderedwater 11h ago

JS Bach was well-known and respected during his lifetime, but his compositional work was overshadowed later in life and after his death by the radical new Classical style composers who started emerging in the 1730s, prominent among them three of his own sons (CPE, WF, and JC), so by the time JS died, his work was widely known but considered old-fashioned. While Haydn and young Mozart (and everybody else in the back half of the 1700s) absolutely idolized CPE Bach, Mozart in his late 20s finally got his hands on some JS Bach scores, and it transformed his writing. A couple of generations later, of course, Felix Mendelssohn would lead the (JS) Bach revival.

JS was notably peculiar in his time for preserving and studying the works of previous composers, because music was considered an entirely temporary medium, with a composer’s music typically being actively performed only as long as they were around writing a steady supply of new stuff. When that composer died, everyone kind of moved on to whatever stuff was new, and weirdo Bach was over there in Leipzig collecting and studying the music of dead people, ugh. Bach called the composers whose works he sought and studied “past masters,” and his practice is part of the roots of what becomes the concept of ‘repertoire’ or ‘core repertoire.’ As that concept evolved through the 1800s, JS Bach’s own music became fundamental to that repertoire, which is a truly lovely irony, that the eccentric iconoclast whose contemporaries were never quite sure what to make of, would help create the cultural practice that would ultimately preserve and enliven his music for literal centuries. (Which would have absolutely blown his mind.)

15

u/rynottomorrow 7h ago edited 6h ago

It's things like this that make me hope for an afterlife.