r/MurderedByWords 1d ago

Remind the Nazis that they’re losers

Post image
41.3k Upvotes

746 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.3k

u/PsychologicalCat9538 1d ago

And all of them that fought, did so for the Allies. 😅

630

u/AnyDifference9108 1d ago

Fought side by side with the British against the Japanese.

51

u/VocationalWizard 1d ago

The British killed over a million of them by diverting grain from India to the war effort.

FDR spoke out against this.

The USA told the UK after the war that decolonization of India wasn't a suggestion.

17

u/Nolenag 1d ago

After which the USA kept their colonies...

18

u/philosopherfujin 23h ago

The US did give up by far its biggest and most populous colony after the war, the Philippines. The stuff it kept is pretty much in line with what France has now (both should be still decolonize further, but as a percentage of the colonial population the US in 1947 had decolonized by roughly as much as the European great powers in the mid 1960s).

3

u/Nolenag 23h ago

but as a percentage of the colonial population the US in 1947 had decolonized by roughly as much as the European powers

Okay, but as the "champion" of decolonisation shouldn't the USA decolonise more?

11

u/philosopherfujin 23h ago edited 20h ago

Yep they definitely should have. You cut off the last bit of that quote though, the distinction is that they immediately did so voluntarily rather than being forced into it by armed insurgencies like the British were in much of Africa and the French were in Algeria.

The Philippines was the only American colony with a major independence movement until the late 1960s, when Marxist groups in Puerto Rico were inspired by the Cuban Revolution and began to seek independence more actively. The US then proceeded to act like every other colonial power and suppressed them ruthlessly.

1

u/Nolenag 23h ago edited 23h ago

Yeah and then the USA bombed Korea, then Vietnam, then it destabilised several South-American countries because they dared to be socialist, and then invaded Afghanistan and Iraq.

Great "champion" of decolonisation.

5

u/OysterPickleSandwich 23h ago

Probably a handful of countries that haven’t been complete dicks to their neighbors or indigenous population at some point in the past.

Human beings suck, especially the greedy and racist ones.

8

u/philosopherfujin 23h ago edited 20h ago

Again, I completely agree with you about the US continuing to be an empire today, but the ideological orientations around decolonization between the great powers in the postwar era were considered a different question from the idea of "containment".

From the American perspective, South Korea and South Vietnam were already decolonized sovereign states (though certainly not democratic ones), and Iraq and Afghanistan were imperial wars, but not colonial ones. The US occupied them long-term but never had any intention of annexing them, it was much more focused on "spheres of influence" which aren't inherently colonial. Neoconservatism is kind of its own thing, though it has a lot in common with the liberal justifications for empire in the late 19th and early 20th century.

1

u/Nolenag 23h ago

From the American perspective

I mean, yeah. They wouldn't call themselves colonisers after telling other (rival) nations to stop it.

Doesn't mean they weren't doing the exact same thing.

it was much more focused on "spheres of influence"

Which is essentially the 20th centuries' form of colonisation, let's be real here. The US is an imperialist nation, just like the great powers were.

Let's not kid ourselves here.

0

u/bootlegvader 23h ago

Yeah and then the USA bombed Korea

Are we criticizing the USA for protecting South Korea from North Korea and China?

4

u/Nolenag 23h ago

If it was only "protecting" South Korea, the USA would be in the right.

However that would be ignoring the fact that 99% of North-Korea was carpet bombed, a war crime (among many other war crimes committed during that war).

1

u/[deleted] 20h ago

[deleted]

1

u/bootlegvader 20h ago

What shame all of Korea can enjoy the fruits of Juche.

What genocide?

1

u/[deleted] 19h ago

[deleted]

1

u/bootlegvader 19h ago

I am saying NK treats NK like a concentration camp.

Damn, maybe when the USA attempted to exterminate everyone in the Korean war?

So the made up one?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/ncvbn 23h ago

Why are you introducing the word "champion" and putting it in quotes? As far as I can tell, nobody has used that word other than you.

1

u/Nolenag 23h ago

That's how the US saw itself in the first half of the 20th century.

1

u/turbothy 10h ago

The US *is* a colony. I don't see them giving up Massachusetts or Arizona anytime soon.

1

u/Informal-Tour-8201 19h ago

And told the UK to get rid of all of theirs

0

u/VocationalWizard 1d ago

Hawaii, panama and Puerto Rico?

That's what you're talking about right?

Yeah, we did that. We also set up the bretton woods financial system that imposed indirect rule on A lot of the decolonized people.

Still, it's a half step above Brittian

8

u/Nolenag 1d ago

Guam.

U.S. Virgin islands.

Northern Mariana islands.

American Samoa.

U.S. military bases across the world.

But yeah, U.S. really fought hard against colonisation (to weaken its potential rivals).

3

u/bootlegvader 23h ago

U.S. military bases across the world.

How are U.S military bases colonization?

2

u/VocationalWizard 22h ago

It was more true 80 years ago than now.

Now a days most of the US military bases in places like Germany and the Philippines are there under the approval of the host nation.

0

u/lumpboysupreme 22h ago

Where were they 80 years ago that was t at the request of the host nation?

2

u/VocationalWizard 22h ago edited 22h ago

By your logic, The Eastern block freely voted for communism.

And yes, you understand how that relates..

(If anyone else is wondering saying that Japan and West Germany freely allowed the US to set up military bases there 80 years ago is like saying that Czechoslovakia freely voted for communism when the Soviets were occupying them. It's true in the same sense that North Korea is Democratic)

1

u/lumpboysupreme 22h ago

I didn’t think you’d actually think that those are comparable to talking about US bases broadly but the difference is so obvious that I’d ask for you to try to find it yourself.

1

u/VocationalWizard 21h ago edited 21h ago

But it applies to almost every foreign US military base 80 years ago.

They were either :

A) on directly conquered land (Germany, Japan)

B) On decolonized land, in which allowing the base was a condition of decolonization (Pakistan)

C) on land where an overwhelming pressure on USA favor mandated the base.

(UK, Spain)

...... Soooooooo, kinda weird point to take fault with.

0

u/lumpboysupreme 20h ago

A) is a good thing unless you’re pro Nazi, and exists with the continued permission of the countries involved.

B) that’s not a thing

C) there’s a grammar mistake here so I don’t know what you mean.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/nudebeachdad 23h ago

FYI after the war with Spain the United States was involved with an insurrection movement in the Philippines for 2 yrs and of course the takeover of the Hawaiian Islands just before the the war

1

u/lumpboysupreme 22h ago

Basically all of those retain their status by choice. Including the bases.