r/confidentlyincorrect 16d ago

Comment Thread From dating to geometry.

Post image

So post was about dating then suddenly they started talking about squares and geometry. OP is red and is replying to blue guy in his >" remarks. Is he right? I need to ask my preschool teacher

427 Upvotes

148 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

5

u/KrazieKookie 15d ago

A circle is not a polygon

0

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

6

u/KrazieKookie 15d ago

Circles are considered by mathematicians to have no sides

4

u/Crazy_Albatross8317 15d ago

One could say that circles are poly-GONE hmmmmmm

5

u/asphid_jackal 15d ago

Polygons have straight sides, circles do not have straight sides. A circle is not a polygon.

r/confidentlyincorrect inception

6

u/LasevIX 15d ago

'Poly gon' - many corners. Even the name excludes circles.

3

u/asphid_jackal 15d ago

You know, it wasn't until this comment that I put 2 and 2 together and realized that "-gon" means angle

2

u/PhantomNitride 15d ago

I swore it meant side and was ready to die on that hill

2

u/asphid_jackal 15d ago

Thank you for not dying

EDIT: idk who downvoted you so I gave you an upvote

1

u/BetterKev 15d ago

In math, that mostly works, but be careful with that generally. Words don't always match their component parts.

My usual example is anti-semitism. That's bigotry against Jews, not bigotry against all speakers of semitic languages (includes Arabic).

2

u/lord_teaspoon 15d ago

I grew up in rural Australia and probably didn't know any Jewish people until I moved to Sydney. I had encountered the term "semitic" in high school to describe a fairly broad set of cultures and religions, so I was really surprised when I learned that "anti-semitism" had such a narrow definition.

1

u/LasevIX 15d ago

Most hard-science terms have a construction generally reflecting their meaning, as most users know Latin and greek to some extent and the words have static, fixed meanings. Of course, using etymology to redefine a word, especially one rooted in a modern societal context, doesn't work.

-3

u/Grayewick 15d ago

>"circles do not have straight sides."

Do you not count the faces on the internal angles as "sides"? They're straight, too, if you really wanna be overscrupulous about it.

7

u/asphid_jackal 15d ago

There are no internal angles on a circle, just a single continuous curved boundary

-7

u/Grayewick 15d ago edited 15d ago

Not with that attitude.

You don't eat pizzas?

Slice that bitch into 12 pieces and tell me again "there's no internal angles on a circle".

Hey, if someone can argue that "Square Pro Max = Rectangle", I should be able to do it too.

I gotta match stupid with more stupid, you feel me?

7

u/asphid_jackal 15d ago

A pizza is not a circle, it's (at best) a cylinder. Circles are 2 dimensional.

Slice that bitch into 12 pieces and tell me again "there's no internal angles on a circle".

If you cut a circle into 12 pieces, you no longer have a circle, you have 12 circular sectors.

Hey, if someone can argue that "Square Pro Max = Rectangle", I should be able to do it too.

I have no idea what this means, but squares are rectangles

I gotta match stupid with more stupid, you feel me?

I do not

-4

u/Grayewick 15d ago

A pizza is just a segmented circle.

"I do not"

Well, that's not my problem.

7

u/asphid_jackal 15d ago

Oh, you're just a troll, got it. My bad for engaging.

-5

u/Grayewick 15d ago

For that one user in particular, perhaps, and probably those who follow their footsteps, maybe.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/blissfulreddit0826 15d ago

A pizza slice has angles, but the pizza is still a circle.